Signal Corps Association Reenactors Division (SCARD)

Discussion Forum

Signal Corps Association Primary Web Site
[ Back to the listing ] [ Post Reply ] [ Help ] [ Search ]
[ List All Forums ]

Posted By: Dave Gaddy on: 07/05/2009 17:47:22 EDT
Subject: RE: Telegraph insecurity during CW

Message Detail:
Tom, Ray has passed along some highlights -- I'd just add some thoughts of my own: (1) Lee made have had reference to plaintext transmissions. Based on grade and status as brigade cdr, Imboden may not have been issued official CSA cipher, nor had provision been made for an acceptable substitute. (2) While Ray has covered the mil wire-tapping aspect, there was an additional concern that plagued the security-minded: newsmen loitering around the tel office, hoping to pick up a "scoop" by "ear," i.e., evesdropping on the tel op or his instrument's click. (One of Major Norris's final actions was a change of key and operational procedures to counter just such a situation in a Georgia tel office.)

While (as Plum notes) many of the commercial tel ops in the pre-war South were Northerners (or Canadians), they seem generally to have adhered to their required oath of confidentiality and conducted themselves in an apolitical manner. As I'm entering the discussion late, I'd stress the caution against plain language revelation as Lee's May 1863 concern, and that concern based upon direct or indirect knowledge acquired by "the media" and revealed in the press.

View Parent Message
Follow ups:

Post a follow up message
NAME:
EMAIL:
SUBJECT:
Type your Reply here:
NOTIFY ME: Yes No
This posting is a:
Comment
Question
Idea

Don't Agree
Challenge
Heads-Up!

Need Feedback
Meeting Request
LINK URL:
LINK TITLE:
IMAGE URL:



Message Search
Search ALL Forums
Filter Messages
Show messages for past days.
Name Search
Type in a full or partial name
Keyword Search
Enter keyword(s) you want to search for separated by a space.

Match Case?
Match ALL Keywords
Match ANY Keyword